May 28, 2022

Calling a Man Bald at Work is Now Considered Sexual Harassment in the United Kingdom

On Thursday, the United Kingdom introduced that insulting a man for being bald in the office constitutes sexual harassment.

Since hair loss is considerably extra widespread in males than in ladies, utilizing the time period is “inherently related to sex” and equal to commenting on the measurement of a lady’s breasts.

The choice comes in the case of Tony Finn, an electrician who sued a native Yorkshire-based household enterprise over the time period.

Based on the supply, issues began to get ugly when one among Finn’s bosses, Jamie King, allegedly referred to as him a “fat, bald c—” and was later terminated from the West Yorkshire-based British Bung.

In court docket, Choose Jonathan Mind debated whether or not King’s baldness insult was disrespectful or if it had crossed the line into harassment.

“In our judgment, there is a connection between the word ‘bald’ on the one hand and the protected characteristic of sex on the other,” the panel mentioned. “We find it to be inherently related to sex.”

The corporate’s lawyer “was right to submit that women and men may be bald” however contended that “baldness is much more prevalent in men than women,” the verdict famous.

“So too, it is much more likely that a person on the receiving end of a remark such as that made by Mr. King would be male,” it added.

Finn’s shaved head was additionally deemed “degrading” and “humiliating,” based on the ruling.

“This is strong language. Although, as we find, industrial language was commonplace on this West Yorkshire factory floor, in our judgment, Mr. King crossed the line by making remarks personal to the claimant about his appearance.”

“This is strong language. Although, as we find, industrial language was commonplace on this West Yorkshire factory floor, in our judgment, Mr. King crossed the line by making remarks personal to the claimant about his appearance.”

Finn’s intercourse harassment allegation was upheld by the tribunal, which additionally discovered that the firm had fired him unfairly after 24 years on the job.

Finn’s financial reward can be decided at a later time.

 

 

 

 

 



Source